Mollica v. County of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Lia D. Mollica, No. 2:19-cv-02017-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The County of Sacramento requests reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order 18 | compelling the production of documents. The County unsuccessfully asserted the protection of 19 | the work product doctrine. As explained in this order, the County did not show the documents in 20 | question were prepared in anticipation of litigation, so they were not protected by the work 21 |…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.