Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Baldwin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1938No. 1801Published

1DissentLe Blanc, Judge

The only theory on which recovery against the defendant can be predicated is, as stated in the majority opinion herein. handed down, that where a person, as was the decedent in this case, is killed after having gone upon a railroad track and become incapitated, in a locality which by its nature is so dangerous, the operators of railroad trains running through such locality are charged with the knowledge of the conditions which exist, and must control their trains under a reasonable expectation that a person may be found at any time lying on the track, unable to extricate himself from danger.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tyer v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  2. Rogers v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Pinckley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Trotter v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API