Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Candlewood Builders, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1985No. C-3416PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

The question we review is whether Matthews was entitled to recover attorney fees on his counterclaim that Candlewood failed to timely complete a residence. In an unpublished opinion, the court of appeals held that Matthews was not entitled to attorney fees. We reverse the court of appeals’ denial of Matthews’ attorney fees and render judgment that Matthews recover these fees. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in all other respects.

Candlewood, a construction company, and Matthews entered into a written contract whereby Candlewood was to construct a residence for Matthews within a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKinley v. DrozdTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bray v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Chilton Insurance Co. v. Pate & Pate Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. Hruska v. First State Bank of DeanvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Aero Energy, Inc. v. Circle C Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Home Savings Ass'n v. GuerraTexas Supreme Court · 1987

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API