Legal Opinion

Stocker v. Arnold

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1934No. 460PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

We have examined all the claimed errors.

Coming to consider the rulings of the court on the admission and rejection of evidence. At page 77 of the record on cross examination of defendant, Pearl Arnold, the court refused to permit the following question to be answered:

“Isn’t it a fact that you and your husband went down to Jesse K. Brumbaugh, another lawyer at that time, tjiat afternoon, isn’t that right?”

We think that the admission or rejection of this evidence was within the discretionary right of the trial court. Hornbeck & Adams, §89.

Dr. Frank Clear, a nephew of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pratt v. ByersOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miles v. WolfeFindlay Municipal Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API