Legal Opinion

Peterman v. Floriland Farms, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 21, 1961No. 30966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a companion case to Floriland Farms, Inc., and Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. v. Peterman et al., Fla., 131 So.2d 477. A succinct statement of the facts will be found in the companion case. June 9, 1960, at the instance of the parties, the deputy commissioner held a hearing after which he entered an order, paragraph 16 of which, the only part involved in this appeal, is as follows:

“Claimants contend that employee’s weekly wage and the death benefits based thereon should be increased because of the provisions of F.S. 440.14 (4) which provides as follows:
“ ‘If it be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florida Industrial Commission ex rel. Special Disability Fund v. National Trucking Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Claim of Kilberg v. VitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Floriland Farms, Inc. v. PetermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crane Company v. Richardson Construction Company, Bahamas Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Floriland Farms, Inc. v. PetermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. National Car Rental v. SanchezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Art Kirchner and Edie Kirchner v. Chattanooga Choo Choo, a Hawaiian Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API