Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Crystal

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order of the Appellate Division affirmed, with costs to all parties filing separate briefs payable out of the estate.

*936The four agreements between decedent and others, including corporations with which he had been associated in his lifetime, providing for the installment purchase of his shares of stock in the close corporations and for specified retirement benefits, were not illusory transfers or agreements within the meaning of the rule in Newman v Dore (275 NY 371, 379). On the contrary, they conformed to the tests established in Matter of Hillowitz (22 NY2d 107, 110) and Matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of HillowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. In re Estate GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RiefbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Matter of ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In re the Estate of RiefbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  4. In Re the Estate of CrystalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API