Legal Opinion

Skrmetta v. MOORE

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1956No. 39999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoberds, P. J.

The subject of this litigation is the title to a. small parcel of land described as that part of Oak Street extending from the south side of East Beach Street (Formerly Front Street) south to the Gulf of Mexico. Oak Street runs north and south and is sixty feet wide. The parcel here involved is the south end of Oak Street extending to the Gulf, apparently a distance of about one hundred and fifty feet. This litigation was begun by á bill in chancery filed by Mrs. L. G. Moore against Lewis E. Curtis undertaking to require Curtis to convey to her title to said lot. Skrmetta intervened in that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Briel v. City of NatchezMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Indianola Light, Ice & Coal Co. v. MontgomeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lowe v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. KuljisMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Luter v. CrawfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Nettleton Church of Christ v. ConwillMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  4. International Paper Company of Moss Point v. Mississippi State Highway DepartmentMississippi Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Abraham v. HarveyMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API