Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 8, 2002No. 02-175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Defendant Scott Brooks appeals from a decision revoking his bail. On appeal, defendant argues: (1) that our decision in State v. Sauve, 159 Vt. 566, 621 A.2d 1296 (1993), requires that the State present live witness testimony and not affidavits; (2) that the court can revoke bail for violation of conditions only if the violation constitutes a threat to the integrity of the judicial system as to the same case in which bail was imposed; and (3) that, as an alternative to revoking bail, the court should have released defendant into the custody of his mother. We conclude that the court’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SauveSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. State v. PoulicakosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. Bates v. OgataHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Snow v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Jeremy GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. State v. Ryan D. StimpsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API