Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hill

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1996No. Civil Action 95-4612PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Defendants George Hill, Frank Green and Barbara Walrath are administrators at the Delaware County Prison. These Defendants seek to dismiss Plaintiff Quentin Johnson’s Complaint against them under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Defendant Kim Cristy is a nurse employed by EMSA, an independent contractor hired by the Prison to provide medical care to the inmates. She also seeks a dismissal of the Complaint against her under Rule 12(b)(6). 1

In considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, a court must…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. White v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colangelo v. AlbertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. Colangelo v. FranckDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. Colangelo v. HutchinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. Colangelo v. PA State Police AvondaleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. HAYES v. GILMOREDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API