Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Joseph

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1951No. 37813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Róberds, P. J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the chancery court sustaining a general demurrer to a bill of intervention filed by Pollard & Hamner in a cause then pending be*831tween Meelad Joseph, complainant, and Mrs. C. Joseph, respondent. The demurrer raised the point, among others, that the bill of intervention did not show that Pollard & Hamner had any vested interest in the cause of action against Mrs. Joseph or in the property which was the subject of the litigation. Since we think that contention is well taken, we consider no other. The question is to he solved under this state of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cochran v. HenryMississippi Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tyson v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Magee v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Collier v. NecaiseMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Freeland v. Blount (In re Blount)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1994
  5. John B. Gillis v. Alexander Scott GilliesMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API