Karcher v. Green
Superior Court of Delaware
Rule to show cause why the judgment No. 398, to October Term, 1883, for $396.89 , entered April 14, 1884, and should not be set aside. The ground alleged was that the said Susan Karcher was a minor under the age of twenty-one years when she signed and executed the judgement bond on which the said judgment was entered.
Read the full summary
Rule to show cause why the judgment No. 398, to October Term, 1883, for $396.89 , entered April 14, 1884, and should not be set aside. The ground alleged was that the said Susan Karcher was a minor under the age of twenty-one years when she signed and executed the judgement bond on which the said judgment was entered. Date of the bond and war rant-of attorney November 3, 1883. Philemon Dill, father of Susan Karcher, testified she was born in July, 1863 or 1864. Mr. Luff remembered going to see her after the birth of her child, Susan Karcher, she is near the age of one of my children, who was…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court
made the rule absolute, being satisfied on a preponderance of evidence, that the said Susan Karcher, the wife of the said Henry Karcher, was a minor under the age of twenty-one years at the time when she signed the bond on which the said judgment was entered.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Miles v. LaytonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
- Statee Ex Rel. Suchta v. District Court of Sheridan CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
- Bowing v. Delaware Rayon Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1937
- Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Commission v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- School District No. 84 v. Asher School Dist. No. 112Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.