Legal Opinion

Cowen v. McNealy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 28, 1950No. Gen. 45,111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Schwartz

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiffs sue for the specific performance of an oral contract involving patents on pharmaceutical products owned by defendant G-lassman. The contract rests entirely in parol and is set forth in five closely typewritten pages providing, among other things, for the organization by the individual plaintiffs of the plaintiff corporation, to which patents were to be assigned, the corporation to have 30 shares of common stock to be issued to plaintiffs, and 409.09 shares of preferred stock, no par value, non-voting and non-dividend,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Express Co. v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Ulrey v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Edwards v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Barker v. HaubergIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Mould v. RohmIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zannis v. Lake Shore Radiologists, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. McDaniel v. SilvernailAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Kurle v. Evangelical Hospital Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Anchor Coupling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Anchor Coupling Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API