First Construction Co. v. Tri-South Mortgage Investors
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Plaintiff First Construction Company (First Construction) appeals from an order of the Hennepin County District Court which required that the indemnification bond offered by Tri-South Mortgage Investors (Tri-South) be accepted, that certain funds held in escrow be paid to Tri-South, and that interest in the escrow account be paid to Tri-South. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
First Construction borrowed $500,000 from Tri-South on November 16, 1973. A note was executed with First Construction promising to repay that amount in full, under certain conditions set out in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heck & Paetow Claim Service, Inc. v. HeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- In the Matter of Brooks & Woodington, Inc., Bankrupt. Appeal of Carncross, Schroeder, Stein, Williams, Young & Company, and David M. Johnson, c.p.a.'sCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Hansen v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Action Time Carpets, Inc. v. Midwest Carpet Brokers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of G.L.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Fales v. NorineNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Tampa Pipeline Transport Co. v. Chase Manhattan Service Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Williamson v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998