Legal Opinion

Laughinghouse v. State ex rel. North Carolina Ports Railway Commission

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 15, 1991No. 9010IC445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff brings forth two assignments of error, and defendant, one. First we examine defendant’s claim that the Industrial Commission erred by failing to dismiss plaintiff’s claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Plaintiff was injured on 31 January 1985, while throwing a “pit switch,” a device set in the ground that when operated switches railway traffic from one track to another. This particular switch had been improperly maintained and had become defective. Maintenance personnel had been notified that the switch needed repairing, but no action had been taken.

Throwing a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Northwestern Distributors, Inc. v. N. C. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Cherney v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARKCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Davis v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Hardrick v. Nc Department of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1998
  5. Sass v. N.C.D.O.C.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API