Legal Opinion
Corrie v. Soloway
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 2013No. A135963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARGULIES, Acting P. J.
Appellant Sidney J. Corrie, Jr., petitioned the
probate court to enforce an option he held to purchase a portion of a property owned by the Armand Borel Trust dated June 20, 1994, as amended and restated in 2008 (Borel Trust or the trust). Respondents successor trustee, Elizabeth Soloway, and trust beneficiary, the East Bay Regional Park District (the District), objected to the petition on the grounds that Come’s option agreement with the trust was void and unenforceable for illegality in that it failed to comply with the Subdivision Map Act (SMA), Government Code…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Asdourian v. ArajCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kahn v. The Dewey GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- East Bay Regional Park District v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Righetti v. Braddock & Logan Group III CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
- SunCal La Quinta v. Eston CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Vanacore and Associates, Inc. v. RosenfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016