Legal Opinion

Zentz v. Peters & Taylor, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 11, 1971No. 283, September Term, 1970PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

We affirm the judgment of the Baltimore City Court in favor of Peters & Taylor, Inc., employer, and State Accident Fund, insurer, appellees, for costs. We find that there was legally sufficient evidence to support the court’s determination that the injury suffered by Richard C. Zentz, employee-appellant, resulted solely from his intoxication while on duty. We hold, therefore, that the lower court’s disallowance of appellant’s claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Law was not clearly erroneous. Maryland Rule 1086.

The case came to the Baltimore City Court on appeal from a disallowance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. State Roads Commission & State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Giant Food, Inc. v. GoochCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Scherr v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Martin Marietta Corp. v. LeiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. BarkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Carling Brewing Co. v. BelznerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. LorkovicCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Schatz v. York Steak House Systems, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Turner v. State, Public DefenderCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API