Legal Opinion
Lazar v. Mauney
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 24, 2000No. Civ.A. 2:99-CV-0062-WCOPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’KELLEY, Senior District Judge.
This case is before the court for consideration of plaintiffs motion to compel [16—1] and plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ brief opposing the motion to compel and for a protective order preventing defendants’ use of a privileged document or its contents [21—1], The court will consider the motion to strike first. The brief subject to the motion to strike was submitted on behalf of defendants Mauney, Bruce, Boonstra, and Dayton (“defendants”). Defendant GlobalTech Industries, Inc. (“GlobalTech”) and its counsel were not a part of the following…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Somer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Cox v. Administrator United States Steel & CarnegieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Marriott Corp. v. American Academy of Psychotherapists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Jefferson Insurance Co. of New York v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Moclaire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
- United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Hays v. Equitex, Inc. (In Re RDM Sports Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
- Jones v. Tauber & Balser, P.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Christenbury v. Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell, LLPDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.