Legal Opinion
Fong Lim v. Nagle
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1925No. 4264PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
On April 19, 1923, the appellant applied to enter the United States at the port of San Francisco as the foreign-born son of Fong Kim, a native-born citizen of the United States. His application was denied by the Department of Labor, and a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in his behalf was likewise denied. From the latter order this appeal is prosecuted.
The principal controversy in the case was over the age of the appellant. He claimed that he was bom on the 23d of August, 1907, and was therefore under 16 years of age at the date of the hearing before the board of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ark Foo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Woo Hoo v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- United States ex rel. Hong v. TodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- General Motors Corp. v. Bellevue Savings Bank Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Fong on v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Young Fat v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Lew Git Cheung v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Hom Ark v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Weedin v. Yeung Bon LipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.