Lundgren v. McColgin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The jury’s answers to written interrogatories are inconsistent with each other and one is inconsistent with the general verdict (CPLR 4111, subd [c]). With respect to an emergency override lever in an aircraft manufactured by defendant Piper, the court charged two theories of liability: negligent design and strict products liability. The court submitted written interrogatories to the jury. Interrogatory No. 3 was as follows: “3. Was the defendant Piper Aircraft Corp. negligent in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barry v. ManglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. HuntleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Alford v. SventekNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Passantino v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Stornelli v. Aakron Rule Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rubin v. PecoraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Mars Associates, Inc. v. New York City Educational Construction FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Lambert v. General MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Fritz v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Maze v. DiBartoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.