Legal Opinion

Roth v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1931No. 19560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, appeal from a judgment m favor of defendant in error, defendant below, in an action to recover an alleged balance due upon an unexpired lease of real property for a term of years.

The lease was in writing, for a term of five years from the 15th day of December, 1920, for a total consideration of $10,500, payable $175 per month, “until the said total sum of ten thousand five hundred dollars ($10,500.00) shall have been fully paid.”

The amount sued for was $1,662.50, being the rental for the period from March 1, to December 16, 1925.

Defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McFarland v. T. W. Lanier Bro.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Rucker v. MasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Flannagan v. DickersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belanger v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Ehlert v. WoodsIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Belanger v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API