Legal Opinion

Smith v. Saul

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 27, 2022No. 5:20-cv-05001Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION MICHELLE S.1, 5:20-CV-05001-DW Plaintiff, REDACTED vs. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES (DOCS. 23, 30) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION2, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michelle S. filed a Motion for Award of Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Doc. 23). Plaintiff subsequently filed a supplemental motion for attorney fees and costs. (Doc. 30). The Commissioner opposes both motions. (Docs. 25, 32, 35). 1 The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Harmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mid-Minnesota Federal Credit UnionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API