Legal Opinion

State v. Doss

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 12, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Clarke District Court. — Hon. W. H. Tedford, J udge. Ti-ie defendant was convicted of the crime of keeping a gambling house. From the judgment, which required him to pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and provided, in default -of payment that he be confined in the county jail, he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, O. J.-

*717 1

2 *714The defendant contends that the district court erred in permitting certain witnesses to testify, on the alleged ground that the minutes of their testimony taken before the grand jury were not returned with the indictment, and filed with it, and that notice of the introduction of their testimony was not given. The record submitted to us shows the following: Attached to- the indictment are what purport to be minutes of the testimony of the witnesses referred to, which appear to be duly signed by the witnesses. On the indictment is an indorsement as follows: “The within…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. State v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. State v. GuisenhauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. State v. PostlewaitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. BadingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. State v. OttleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API