Legal Opinion

Kaufmann v. Prudential Ins. Co.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided January 5, 2012No. CV-11-119-PBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Kaufmann v . Prudential Ins. Co. CV-11-119-PB 1/5/2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Deborah J. Kaufmann v. Case N o . 11-cv-119-PB Opinion N o .

2012 DNH 003

Prudential Insurance Company of America MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A claimant in an action for benefits under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) ordinarily must timely exhaust administrative remedies before commencing an action in this court. The question presented by the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is whether such a claimant must comply with an administrative appeal procedure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Victor Essil QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Donald Bachelder v. Communications Satellite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Morales-Alejandro v. Medical Card System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Entergy Services, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API