Jimenez v. Seickel & Sons
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order entered May 14, 1964, granting plaintiff’s motion to amend and increase the ad damnum clause from $100,000 to $500,000, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. To permit the substantial increase of the ad damnum clause sought by plaintiff requires a prima facie showing of the inadequacy of the demand in the complaint supported by a physician’s affidavit demonstrating with some degree of specificity the nature of the plaintiff’s injuries, their prospective…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of Watertown v. RoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Adamsons v. American Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- De Sappio v. Axel Brostrom & SonNew York Supreme Court · 1978