Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Seickel & Sons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered May 14, 1964, granting plaintiff’s motion to amend and increase the ad damnum clause from $100,000 to $500,000, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant, and the motion denied. To permit the substantial increase of the ad damnum clause sought by plaintiff requires a prima facie showing of the inadequacy of the demand in the complaint supported by a physician’s affidavit demonstrating with some degree of specificity the nature of the plaintiff’s injuries, their prospective…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. City of Watertown v. RoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Adamsons v. American Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. De Sappio v. Axel Brostrom & SonNew York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API