Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Hoover

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1967No. 4674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant Hicks from summary judgment against him for $6972.

Defendant Hicks purchased the stock of Star Tire Company on August 5, 1963 without complying with the Bulk Sales Act (Art. 4001 Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.St.). Plaintiff *614was a creditor of Star Tire Company for $6972 due under a lease contract. Thereafter plaintiff sued Star Tire, and on July 27, 1964, secured judgment for $6972 plus $2250 attorney's fees.

On December 29, 1965 plaintiff sued defendant Hicks for the $6972 plus $2250 attorney’s fees, on account of Hicks purchasing the stock…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gardner v. Goodner Wholesale Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Peek v. BeeryTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Adams v. First State Bank, MonahansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toro v. First City Bank-Westheimer Plaza, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  2. Jeffery I. Rosin, Vinetta Rosin, Berco James Rosin, and Meliora Brielle Rosin, Minors by Next Friend Earle Cobb, Jr. v. the Berco & Leja Rosin Trust, Rose Rosin, Trustee, Individlually and as Independent of the Estate of Bernard Rosin, Rosalyn Rosin, and Stanley Blend, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API