Legal Opinion

Alberta E. Burns, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 25, 1983No. 81-2293Published

1Opinion of the Court

701 F.2d 193

226 U.S.App.D.C. 182, 1 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 227

Alberta E. BURNS, on behalf of herself and all others

similarly situated, Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD.

No. 81-2293.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Sept. 24, 1982.

Decided Feb. 25, 1983.

Petition for Review of a Decision of the United States Railroad Retirement Board.

Gil Deford, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Thomas W. Sadler, Gen. Atty., Railroad Retirement Bd., Chicago, Ill., with whom Dale G. Zimmerman, Gen. Counsel, and Edward S. Hintzke, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Railroad…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API