State v. Arndt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of aggravated robbery, Minn.St. 609.245, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum term of 20 years in prison, the sentence to run consecutively to a prior 20-year sentence defendant was already serving. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant contends (1) that there was as a matter of law insufficient evidence identifying him as the robber, (2) that the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce during its casein-chief evidence of another aggravated robbery committed by defendant, and (3) that…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. TscheuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.