Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Crow Motor Car Co.

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided October 15, 1914Published

1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.

The ease is submitted upon a motion to dismiss an attachment on the ground that the affidavit is insufficient in law; that the al*558legations thereof to the effect that the indebtedness and obligations sued upon were fraudulently contracted, are untrue.

Plaintiffs Taylor and Cooke, under a contract with defendants, became agents to sell the motor ears of the latter. Under the contract they deposited $250 with defendant as a guaranty of good faith. Defendant agreed to apply $50 of the deposit on each of the first five cars sold by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sold two ears which were fully paid for and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Harvey v. ManningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Sunday Mirror Co. v. GalvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Hughes v. LakeMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API