Taylor v. Crow Motor Car Co.
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
1Opinion of the CourtKinkead, J.
The ease is submitted upon a motion to dismiss an attachment on the ground that the affidavit is insufficient in law; that the al*558legations thereof to the effect that the indebtedness and obligations sued upon were fraudulently contracted, are untrue.
Plaintiffs Taylor and Cooke, under a contract with defendants, became agents to sell the motor ears of the latter. Under the contract they deposited $250 with defendant as a guaranty of good faith. Defendant agreed to apply $50 of the deposit on each of the first five cars sold by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs sold two ears which were fully paid for and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Harvey v. ManningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Sunday Mirror Co. v. GalvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hughes v. LakeMississippi Supreme Court · 1886