Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Chambers

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1878PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Special Law and Equity Court. — Hon. R. E. Cowan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

— Action by mechanic on an account for work done on house and materials furnished therefor. Defendant denied in her answer the allegations of the petition, and also alleged that plaintiff had contracted to do *627the work for a much less sum, and that he was fully paid such sum, &c. On trial had plaintiff had iudgment, which defendant seeks to reverse.

I. If there was any variance between the allegations of the petition and the evidence offered in their support, and the defendant was thereby misled, she should, under the statute, 2 Wag. Stat., § 1, p. 1083, have set forth in what respect she was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. Chillicothe & Des Moines City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Clements v. MaloneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Ely v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  4. Fischer v. MaxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  5. Wells v. SharpSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Salmon Falls Bank v. LeyserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Von Trebra v. Laclede Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Howard County v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Fisher & Co. Real Estate Co. v. Staed Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  5. Farmers Bank v. Manchester Assurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API