Legal Opinion
State v. Lasley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 23, 1987No. 86-3168PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 9.160 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the county court of Pinellas County certified the following question as one of great public importance.
WHERE A DEFENDANT HAS ENTERED A PLEA IN TRAFFIC COURT WHICH WAS NOT ELECTRONICALLY OR STENOGRAPHICALLY RECORDED OR THE SUBJECT OF A SIGNED WRITTEN WAIVER, MAY SUCH PLEA BE WITHDRAWN UPON APPROPRIATE MOTION WITHOUT ANY FURTHER SHOWING OF PREJUDICE?
The state has appealed and we reverse, but we do not reach the certified question in the light of the following analysis.
Edwin Lasley and Robert Buchanan were convicted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rita v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Bolyea v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- State v. LasleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Shell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marriott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. HowardCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991