Legal Opinion

Wright v. Delafield & Curtis

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1857PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL by the plaintiff, from a judgment entered at a special term. In the year 1835, the executors, &c., of Bobert Mitchell, deceased, the trustees of creditors of the firm of Carnochan & Mitchell, and six other persons in their own right, being the proprietors in various proportions of a tract of land, in Florida, between the St. Mark’s and Apalachicola rivers, containing about one million two hundred thousand acres of land, known as the Forbes’ Purchase, entered into an…

Read the full summary

APPEAL by the plaintiff, from a judgment entered at a special term. In the year 1835, the executors, &c., of Bobert Mitchell, deceased, the trustees of creditors of the firm of Carnochan & Mitchell, and six other persons in their own right, being the proprietors in various proportions of a tract of land, in Florida, between the St. Mark’s and Apalachicola rivers, containing about one million two hundred thousand acres of land, known as the Forbes’ Purchase, entered into an agreement dated on the 25th of November of that year, reciting that, to enable the proprietors to give clear and…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Mitchell, J.

Previous to "November, 1835, Peter, John, Thomas and Collin Mitchell, Richard Camochan, Thomas Yermilyea, B. W. Rogers, John Graham and Benjamin Marshall were interested in lands in Florida, known as Forbes & Co.’s purchase, and amounting to about 1,200,000 acres. Their title had been in dispute, but was confirmed by a decision of the supreme court of the United States. On the 28th of November, 1835, they agreed that each proprietor should vest, by regular deeds, the whole title to the .lands, legal and equitable, in three trustees, and that the affairs of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coddington v. BayCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
  2. Thompson v. KetchamNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  3. Abell v. DouglassNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Dollfus v. FroschCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  5. Hosford v. NicholsNew York Court of Chancery · 1828

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fellows v. HeermansNew York Supreme Court · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API