Sanders v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
It may be that, under a liberal interpretation, the original complaint could be construed as an action as against the town to recover compensation for an interest in real property taken by a governmental agency for public use. If so, any doubt in respect thereto-is laid at rest by the amendment to the complaint in which it is alleged “that on account of the unlawful, wrongful and joint tortious conduct of the defendants in depriving the plaintiffs of their rights and easements in and to said part of said street as above set out, the defendant, the town of Smithfield, in unlawfully authorizing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hoyle v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Ham v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Sanders v. . SmithfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Broadhurst v. . Blythe Brothers Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.