Legal Opinion

Teckemeyer v. Supreme Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion by the plaintiff, Mary J. Teckemeyer, for a new trial oft a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the General Term in the first instance upon the-verdict of a jury in favor of the defendant, directed by the court after a trial at the Erie Circuit oft the 14th day of "January, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Follett, J.:

This action was begun April 17, 1894, by the beneficiary, named in a certificate issued by the defendant, to recover the amouftt which it agreed to pay on the death of a member of the- association.

The defendant was incorporated-by chapter 586 of the Laws of 1880, and belongs to the class of corporations known as mutual benefit societies. By the act it is authorized to- create and hold a' fund, and pay therefrom a sum not exceeding $5,000 on the death of any of its members, pursuant to such rules and regulations as the corporation may adopt, power being conferred to make, from time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Homer v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Powers v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Glassey v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beil v. Supreme LodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Beil v. Supreme LodgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API