Legal Opinion

Fitzhugh v. Mason

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 20, 1905No. Civ. No. 94PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a motion for new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The plaintiff is an architect and brings this suit for the breach of an alleged contract of employment by the defendants. On May 5, 1903, the court made the following order: “Findings ordered in favor of the plaintiff. Damages will be fixed at the sum of $700.” The findings and judgment were filed February 2, 1904, and judgment thereon entered for plaintiff in the sum of $700; from which, and an order denying his motion for a new trial, he and the defendant Mason each appeal.

The allegations of the complaint as to the contract are, in effect: That during the month of October, 1901, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cederberg v. RobisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. DelaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Fites v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API