Legal Opinion

Hildebrandt v. Hagen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1949No. 34,898PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 38 N.W.2d 815. Action to enjoin defendant from maintaining a fence and for judgment directing its removal as an interference with plaintiffs' easement for roadway purposes over certain property upon which it had been erected by defendant.

The trial court determined that plaintiffs were the owners of an easement for travel over a part of the property involved, and directed defendant to remove the fence therefrom as an obstruction thereto and further enjoined him from thereafter interfering therewith.

Defendant thereupon moved for amended findings or for a new trial. His motion was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smith v. ShiebeckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Dartnell v. BidwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  3. Davis v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
  4. Swan v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Carmody v. MulrooneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tynan v. KSTP, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Prior Lake State Bank v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Larson v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Wheeler v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API