Legal Opinion

Doe v. Selsky

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 17, 2012No. 08-CV-6199LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, John Doe, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”), alleges that the defendants, all of whom at all relevant times, were DOCCS employees or officials, have violated his constitutional rights in certain respects in 2004, while plaintiff was confined at Elmira Correctional Facility.1 Defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eric Jenkins v. Lt. HaubertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Allen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. Butler v. DowdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Castro v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chauncey Stewart, a/k/a Chonice Stewart v. Edward Castine, individually, Dean Laclaire, individually, Matthew Gravelle, individually, Kevin Santo, individually, Todd Strack, individually, N. Johnson, individually, N. Young, individually, Benjamin Darrah, individually, and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, (the names John and Jane Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown)District Court, N.D. New York · 2026
  2. Cisse v. AnnucciDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API