Legal Opinion

State v. Riddle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 15, 1931No. 13144Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

This matter comes before this Court on appeal by the State from an order issued by his Honor, Judge T. S. Sease, granting a writ of habeas corpus for and discharging the defendant, C. Rhett Riddle, who was arrested on a charge of the violation of the Act of 1930 (36 Statutes, p. 1386), making it a misdemeanor for any person to “knowingly, intentionally and willfully violate the laws of the State of South Carolina enacted for the purpose of prohibiting the charging, collecting, or receiving of usurious interest.” So much of the Act in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Tire Co. v. Keystone Tire Sales Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Xepapas v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  3. Charleston Oil Co. v. Poulnot, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. In Re Will of RotonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API