Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Vogt v. Donahey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1923No. Nos. 17904, 17817PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Epitomized Opinion

The governor, after hearing had before him, re| moved Vogt from the office of mayor -of M-assilloiT *845for Misconduct, non-feasance and gross neglect of duty in office- Writs of mandamus and quo war-. ranto were asked on relation of Vogt against the governor and K, Vogt’s successor, respectively. In denying the.writs, the Supreme Court held:

Attorneys — Joseph McGhee and P. E. Dempsey, Columbus, and Elson Weffer and Milton' Haines, MassijUon, for Vogt; C. C. Crabbe, Atty. Gen., and Edward E- Corn, Ironton, for Donahey; L- C- Wiggins, Massillon, for Kirchoffer-

Whijle the greater…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. HeitzlerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. McMillen v. Diehl, Judge.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State ex rel. Stokes v. Probate CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API