In Re Juveniles A, B, C, D, E
Washington Supreme Court
1Concurrence · UtterUtter, J.
(concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I disagree with the majority's conclusion that AIDS testing of *99a sex offender is constitutionally valid even when that individual has not engaged in conduct capable of transmitting the virus. I would hold that AIDS testing of sex offenders is only permissible where there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed involving the transfer of blood, semen, or other bodily fluid capable of transmitting the AIDS virus.
In this case, the majority abandons one of the core elements of the Fourth Amendment, significantly diminishing the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Johnson.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.