Legal Opinion

Onderdonk v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 7, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00001Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NORTHEASTERN DIVISION JOHN DAVID ONDERDONK ) ) v. ) No. 2:19-0001 ) ANDREW M. SAUL ) Commissioner of Social Security1 ) To: The Honorable Waverly D. Crenshaw, Chief District Judge R E P O R T A N D R E C O M M E N D A T I O N Plaintiff filed this action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s claim for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) as provided under Title XVI of the Social…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API