Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tyler v. Akerman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 12, 1923Published

1DissentEllis, J.

The only question presented by this record is whether a city may be charged as g'arninshee.

*490Tyler had brought an action against Ackerman in the circuit court for Brevard County. The attorney for the plaintiff made an affidavit in garnishment stating that he had reason to believe that the City of Cocoa and W. F. Allen have in their possession or control moneys, goods and chattels belonging to the defendant Ackerman.

The City appeared by its attorney in answer to the writ which was issued and moved to quash it upon the ground that a municipal corporation is not subject to garnishment.

The motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keggin v. County of HillsboroughSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  2. Duval County v. Charleston Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. Michigan Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Duval County GarnisheeSupreme Court of Florida · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API