Legal Opinion

Blackburn v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment ■unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. It is well established that, to be entitled to judgment as a matter of law, “the defendant-movant must demonstrate that the plaintiff failed to make out a prima facie case; the plaintiffs evidence must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be given the benefit of every favorable inference which can be reasonably drawn from the evidence” (Campbell v Rogers & Wells, 218 AD2d 576, 580; see, Napolitano v Dhingra, 249 AD2d 523, 524). Only when there…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Rogers & WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Harding v. Noble Taxi Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. George v. Ponderosa Steak HouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. McCague v. Walsh ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Gernard v. AgostiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API