Legal Opinion

Goodwin Invalid Bedstead Co. v. Darling

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 7, 1882Published

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

The plaintiff sues as a corporation. The defendant’s answer “ denies each and every allegation in the plaintiff’s writ and declaration contained.” Before the St. of 1881, c. 113, was enacted, such pleadings put in issue the fact of the corporate existence of the plaintiff. Hungerford National Bank *359v. Van Nostrand, 106 Mass. 559. Mosler v. Potter, 121 Mass. 89. Hebron Church Deacons v. Smith, 121 Mass. 90, note. Williamsburg Ins. Co. v. Frothingham, 122 Mass. 391.

J. W. Pickering, for the plaintiff. C. R. Brainard, for the defendant.

The St. of 1881, c. 113, which provides that, when it appears…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. FrothinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Bahmann & Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Hungerford National Bank v. NostrandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API