Legal Opinion

Churchill v. University of Colorado at Boulder

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2010No. 09CA1713PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge GRAHAM.

We are called upon to resolve questions concerning whether a university and its regents should be immune from a civil suit. Professor Ward Churchill appeals the trial court's judgment (1) directing a verdict in favor of the University of Colorado and its Board of Regents and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim that the University's investigation of his academic works constituted an adverse employment action; (2) holding as a matter of law that the University was entitled to quasi-judicial immunity, vacating the jury's verdict, and entering judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Churchill v. University of Colorado at BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
  2. Reigel v. SavaSeniorCare L.L.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Howe v. Microsoft Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People in re L.KColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Sure-Shock Electric, Inc. v. Diamond Lofts Venture, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API