Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Sims

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2002No. 28473Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDavis, Chief Justice

(Filed Dec. 5, 2002)

In this lawyer disciplinary matter, the Hearing Panel Subcommittee (hereinafter referred to as “the Panel”) concluded that the respondent, John G. Sims (hereinafter referred to as “Mi*. Sims”), violated Rules 3.6, 3.8 and 8.4 of the West Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. The majority opinion agreed with this finding and held that “[tjhere is no question or dispute that the allegations in this case were proved by clear and convincing evidence.” The Panel recommended that this Court suspend the law license of Mr. Sims for ninety days and assess the costs of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics v. RoarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. KeenanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Committee on Legal Ethics v. BoettnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API