Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Taliaferro
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 1960No. Civ. 18611PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *
Appeal from a judgment entered after the court sustained a general demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend.
This case is another incident in the lengthy battle between these parties and is a companion to Taliaferro v. Taliaferro, ante, p. 140 [2 Cal.Rptr. 716], just decided, which gives a more detailed history of the struggle than will be recounted here.
The complaint is in three counts. It is alleged:
“I
“That defendant is indebted to plaintiff upon a written instrument.
“II
“That said written instrument is in words and figures as follows: ‘that there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Estate of BuckhantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Gordon v. VucinichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thomas v. McElroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Taliaferro v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hawkins v. PackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.