Legal Opinion

Anderson v. AIG Property Casualty Company

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided October 28, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00774Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION NANCY ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:20-cv-774-FtM-38MRM AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. / ORDER1 Before the Court is Defendant AIG Property Casualty Company’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6). Plaintiff Nancy Anderson did not timely respond. The Motion is granted in part. This is a hurricane insurance dispute. Anderson alleges she is the named insured on an insurance policy for a home (the “House”). And after a covered loss, AIG did not pay out. This Motion does not challenge the merits. Rather, AIG contends…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Focus on the Family v. Pinellas Suncoast Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. Por A. v. LamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Eiras v. Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation Division of Alcoholic Beverages & TobaccoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API