Scaife v. Coleman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Ward, Associate Justice.
The principal question for decision is whether appellees (Otto Coleman and Ray Eisele) have a right, acquired by prescription, of ingress and egress to and from their property over lands belonging to appellant (Mrs. Jane Scaife). Tom Dixon, a lessee, has no interest in this litigation and we will hereafter refer to Mrs. Scaife as appellant. A summary of the relevant and undisputed facts is set forth below.
Appellant owns (among other lands) the north one-half of the northwest quarter (80 acres) in Section 10 which we will hereafter, for clarity, refer to as tract…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fullenwider v. KitchensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Martin v. Bond, TrusteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Westlake v. Duncan, Dieckman, & Duncan Mining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Salzer v. BalkmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rochelle v. PilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968