Legal Opinion

Scaife v. Coleman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 10, 1965No. 5-3505PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

The principal question for decision is whether appellees (Otto Coleman and Ray Eisele) have a right, acquired by prescription, of ingress and egress to and from their property over lands belonging to appellant (Mrs. Jane Scaife). Tom Dixon, a lessee, has no interest in this litigation and we will hereafter refer to Mrs. Scaife as appellant. A summary of the relevant and undisputed facts is set forth below.

Appellant owns (among other lands) the north one-half of the northwest quarter (80 acres) in Section 10 which we will hereafter, for clarity, refer to as tract…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. KitchensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  2. Martin v. Bond, TrusteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Westlake v. Duncan, Dieckman, & Duncan Mining Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Salzer v. BalkmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rochelle v. PilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API