Legal Opinion

Associated Utility Contractors of Maryland, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 9, 2002No. CIV. AMD-01-1508PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DAVIS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Associated Utility Contractors of Maryland, Inc. (“AUC”), filed this action against defendant Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (“the City”) on or about May 23, 2001, to challenge the implementation of the public contracting affirmative action program created by Baltimore City Ordinance 00-98 and a related mayoral executive order (“the Executive Order”). Ordinance 00-98 became law upon the Mayor’s approval of City Council BiU 00-0211 on November 28, 2000. Now pending is the City’s motion to dismiss AUC’s amended complaint, in which the City argues…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. North Carolina Motorcoach Ass'n Ex Rel. McGill, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API