Legal Opinion

Fletcher & Bullock v. Young

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Contracts. Warranty. Charge of Court. Before Judge Willis. Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

W. H. Young sued Fletcher & Bullock for breach of warranty on the following witten instrument:

“Columbus, Ga„ 5th May, 1881.
“Received of Wm. H. Young the sum of four hundred dollars for one pair of large bay horses, both of which we guarrantee to be perfectly sound and without blemish. $400. One horse now having a cold or little distemper.”

[Signed] Fletcher & Bullock.

After the evidence had closed on the trial, the court charged the jury as follows :

“A certain instrument has been introduced in testimony in this case — a receipt which they claim is a warranty, warranting the horse…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Callaway v. Jones & QuattlebumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Napier v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Bullard v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Potts v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Brown & Co. v. MatthewsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API